ð¿ Here is a script (copy and paste alt text for ease!)
Use and adapt our drafted comment below or write your own!
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the Endangerment Finding. The science is clear: greenhouse gases unequivocally harm our health and our environment. Weakening or repealing the Endangerment Finding will make it harder, and costlier to protect our communities from pollution and from the effects of climate change.
Optional: I care about this issue because
I urge you to keep the Endangerment Finding in place and to apply science to protect our health and our environment for generations to come.
****Remember, if you want to cite research to upload the paper as a file.****
The last assessment of the state of climate science from the United Nationsâs Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), published in its final form 2 years ago, was a monumental effort, with 721 volunteer scientists synthesizing all available published research. Yesterday, the Department of Energy (DOE) released its own climate assessment, as part of a campaign by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to overturn its landmark endangerment finding from 2009, which found that burning fossil fuels endangers public health and established carbon dioxide as a pollutant EPA could regulate. But the DOE reportâcalled A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climateâhad fewer authors than IPCCâs: just five.
Handpicked by DOE Secretary Chris Wright, a fossil fuel entrepreneur, the authors are well known to climate scientists. Although the members of this Climate Working Group all hold scientific doctorates, they hold contrarian views on climate science that are out of step with the mainstream. The report, assembled in months, argues that some of the warming attributed to fossil fuel burning is instead driven by natural cycles or variability in the Sun, and that sea level rise has not been accelerating. Climate researchers say the authors cherry-picked evidence and highlighted uncertainties to achieve the net effect of downplaying the impacts of climate change. âThis shows how far we have sunk,â says Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard University. âClimate denial is now the official policy of the U.S. government.â
The report is far from comprehensive. Many of its arguments are common among critics of climate action, previously made online and in obscure journals. It amounts to a âlaw brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide,â said Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, on Bluesky. âTheir goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for (carbon dioxideâs) innocence. This is a fundamental departure from the norms of science.â (...)
Not true...Cape Town faced Day Zero (when it would run out of water completely) back in 2018....and its nothing to do with climate change.
The immediate cause of the water crisis was the extreme drought from 2015â2017 that exceeded the planning norms of the Department of Water and Sanitation. Research on long-term weather data done by the Climate System Analysis Group at the University of Cape Town determined that the low rainfall between the years 2015 and 2017 was a very rare and extreme event.<49> Decreasing rainfall trends are linked to broader changes in the atmospheric and oceanic circulation, including the poleward shift of the Southern Hemisphere moisture corridor between 2015â17, displacement of the jet-stream and an expansion of the semi-permanent South Atlantic High.<50> 2017 was the driest year since 1933, and possibly earlier, since comparable data before 1933 was not available. It also found that a drought of this severity would statistically occur approximately once every 300 years.<32>
Not true...Cape Town faced Day Zero (when it would run out of water completely) back in 2018....and its nothing to do with climate change.
Cut out the bullshit.......
Steve Miller Band cancels all upcoming tour dates due to extreme weather
"The combination of extreme heat, unpredictable flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes and massive forest fires make these risks for you our audience, the band and the crew unacceptable," the statement said. "So ... You can blame it on the weather. The tour is cancelled."
So, is Steve headed to his basement with his police band scanner never to emerge again as the risk to go out in public is too great? I'll bet this excuse isn't going over too well with tour promoters, venues and advertisers.
Rising food prices are the second-largest effect of climate change that people see in their day-to-day lives, only exceeded by extreme heat, said Kotz, who led the report.
âWhile the 2023-2024 El Nino (weather system) likely played a role in amplifying a number of these extremes, their increased intensity and frequency is in line with the expected and observed effects of climate change,â the report said.
Last year was the hottest year on record, with global temperatures exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial climate conditions for the first time and high temperature records broken across much of the globe. With further warming to between 2.2 degrees and 3.4 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels likely by the end of the century, according to the United Nations Environment Programme, unprecedented weather conditions and further price shocks are to be expected, the report adds.
The knock-on effects of food-price spikes muddy the outlook for central banks, as increased costs raise headline inflation and make it more challenging to deliver monetary stability. Price shocks could also exacerbate a range of health outcomes as low-income households cut back, from malnutrition to diabetes and many types of cancers.
Steve Miller Band cancels all upcoming tour dates due to extreme weather
"The combination of extreme heat, unpredictable flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes and massive forest fires make these risks for you our audience, the band and the crew unacceptable," the statement said. "So ... You can blame it on the weather. The tour is cancelled."
